Here's the visual summary of our debate. You were all great fighting for your side of the question. Let's cross our fingers and hope most of us believe in personal agency and in the possibility of change :)
Katy Perry's "Bon Appétit" is a video comparing a woman to a meal, ready to be devoured, as indicated by not only the visual themes throughout the video, but also by the lyrics. The video starts with some squirting noises as the name of the song is coated onto some batter, followed by a neon “NSFW” (Not Safe for Work) which marks the start of a rather disturbing experience. Katy Perry appears covered in saran wrap, much like a steak, and is presented to the viewer with skin-colored, form-fitting lingerie. A group of knife-sharpening chefs surround her, cut her out, and push her into a vat of flour, like one would do to batter, before pounding it (which I think is the metaphor they were going for here). The group of chefs then roll her out like dough, twisting her body in several disturbing ways. She’s put on a wooden board, seasoned and “dressed” with a plethora of vegetables, and thrown into a boiling pot of water. Her nails, and the rest of her body, ...
It is a given fact that music over the years has become a major industry. Some people also feel that music has been ruined due to being treated solely as a business, and that is backed by the number of people in the music business who don’t care about the music at all and are driven only by money. That's the reason we have the mainstream pop genre. A pretty face (preferably young, in her/his 20s) is picked by a label to become one of the faces of that company. But what does music have to do with this? Not much… It is assumed that the “artists” picked have skill enough to perform what others will write for them… That’s right! Others will write for them! In fact, hardly any Pop artist writes her/his own music or gives ANY contribution for that matter. For example, The Weeknd’s single “I can´t feel my face” (ranked nr. 1 on the Billboards), who also won the Grammy Awards, Record of the Year and Best Pop Solo Performance, was co-written by FOUR different ...
Formula One (F1) has been advertising leading tobacco companies for decades, up until 2005, when it became prohibited by the European Union Tobacco Advertising Directive. Tobacco ads on F1 cars ceased to exist, except in one case: Marlboro, by Philip Morris. They used subliminal techniques of Alibi Marketing, which is a way to go around restrictions in advertising. In this particular case it was illegal to advertise tobacco brands, but it was not illegal to use things and images which are associated with brands. That made it easy to cheat, since Marlboro and Ferrari share the colour red. Redness is something difficult to legislate against. All they needed to do was to use some kind of design for potential buyers to associate with their brand. See ''Alibi marketing – tobacco,'' here (uploaded by the UK CTAS, 13.3.2014). Picture 1. Bruce Grant-Braham, John Britton. Marlboro ‘barcodes’ on both the Ferrari race car and the driver's clothing in ear...
Comments
Post a Comment